Science News Forum - SciScoop
Home ¦ Join SciScoop ¦ Sections ¦ Categories ¦ Contact ¦ FAQ ¦ Links ¦ Sci-Art ¦ Search...

Now online: 14 Anonymous(s) and mertero       SciScoop membership: 3403. Total stories since November 2002: 2748

Search SciScoop
 

Section Stories
The stories that didn't quite make it to the Front Page...

GE shows a glimpse into the future of lighting [OLEDs]
by mertero
News::Environment

Lose Stomach Fat, Get Six Pack Abs
by sciencebase
Reviews::Medicine

Science Fair Projects E-Book Download
by sciencebase
Site News::Potpourri

Free Computer Information Resources
by sciencebase
News::Announcements

A simulator of catastrophe to improve the programming of autonomous robots of rescue
by engineering
Events::Robotics

Radioprotection by Plant Flavone
by cesarsed
News::Chemistry

G8+5: FEEL THE HEAT, ACT NOW! Quick! Quick! Quick!
by koantum
Events::Environment

Double-blind Review Favors Increased Representation of Female Authors
By FriendlyBacteria, Section Commentary
Posted on Mon Jan 14, 2008 at 06:11:17 AM PST

Potpourri A study published this month has concluded that a switch to double-blind peer review (where neither authors nor reviewers see one another's names) leads to increased publication of papers with female first authors.

Amber Budden and her colleagues analysed papers published in two ecology journals. One, (Behavioural Ecology) switched to double-blind review in 2001 while the other (Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology) uses the traditional method of single-blind review, where reviewers remain anonymous but authors do not.

In the four years which followed the introduction of double-blind review, the overall number of papers published by Behavioural Ecology increased relative to the preceding four years. The proportion of papers with a female first authors also showed a small but significant increase of 7.9%. As there was no comparable change in authors publishing in Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, the authors concluded that the observed effect was not attributable to a simple increase in the number of women working in the field and could be ascribed to the change in peer review policy.

The figure of 7.9% may seem small, but it is three times greater than the recorded increase in female ecology graduates in the USA across the same time period (http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf07305). Assuming the US pattern reflects an international trend, the authors calculate that the figure of 7.9% actually represents a 33% increase in the representation of female authors.

Journals are often loath to introduce double-blind review, citing the increased administrative load this would incur. However, given the potential such a policy change could have on the representation of women scientists - and possibly also of young, unestablished researchers - it seems that it could have significant benefits for female researchers and increase the number and range of papers published.

The original article was published in Trends in Ecology and Evolution and may be found here.

Double-blind Review Favors Increased Representation of Female Authors | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)

Correction (none / 0) (#1)
by FriendlyBacteria on Thu Jun 05, 2008 at 01:13:44 AM PST
A study currently in press (Webb et al, Trends Ecol. Evol. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.003) casts doubt on the conclusions of Budden et al.  The new study reports that a similar increase in the representation of female authors was observed over the same period in other ecology journals which had retained single-blind review.



  • Interesting by sciencebase, 06/06/2008 06:11:09 AM PST (none / 0)
Double-blind Review Favors Increased Representation of Female Authors | 2 comments (2 topical, 0 hidden)

Bookmark this story with del.icio.us Digg this story Furl this item Have you Reddit?

Login
Username:
Password:


Register Now Why join?

Add SciScoop to:

Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE Subscribe to our partner Science Newsfeed for FREE

Related Science Links
· http://www .nsf.gov/statistics/nsf07305
· here
· More on Potpourri
· Also by FriendlyBacteria

All trademarks etc are owned by their respective companies
Comments are copyright individual "Poster" and opinions expressed are not necessarily those of individual members of the SciScoop Community. Site ©2002-2008 SciScoop.